Mike Ross Law Blog: CA685/2024 The Court Of Appeal preference for Adsense
When you can no longer fake it: Highmark Homes Defamation Case
Sir.ly not: You mean Mike Ross from NZ is actually a fake?
A follow up article including screenshots of the Mike Ross Law Blog in action on Sir.ly pay for clicks on adsense to demonstrate how a Court of Appeal NZ Panel Decision is an appalling display of arrogance and laziness and something big has to happen to make the change #NZJustice #eggonyourface
What more do I have to say?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR THE TRIENNIAL REVIEW BOARD:
This blog article demonstrates how the NZ Court of Appeal [2025] NZCA 281 panel ignored verified evidence presented by Watkins of a targeted "spamdexing" campaign. While the Registry confirmed receipt of Google search screenshots on June 4th and 13th, the final judgment claimed "no copy of the blog was provided." This judicial decision allows an inauthentic "Mike Ross" persona to continue profiting from Google AdSense via the defamation of a self-represented litigant. One who for years has urged the court to read her evidence instead of echoing the opinion of a Disputes Tribunal referee with a personal vendetta and no right to rule over an employment dispute before the Employment Relations Act 2000 legislated process.
Technical Observation for The Court of Appeal Panel and their Manager Maryanne McKennie
The Appeal Court of NZ have set such a high barrier for Watkins to gain Access to Justice that their focus is solely on optics for the Appeal Court at all costs not to let any self litigant win any case or bring any appeal to them without a pre-meditated outcome of dismissal.
Therefore the way Highmark Homes conducted the constructive dismissal of Watkins is not too dissimilar to the way the High Court and the Court of Appeal have treated Watkins in their conduct and their decisions.
To the Chief Justice Rt Hon Helen Winkellman, Ministers of Parliament and the NZ Police and their Minister Mark Mitchell:
The High Court and the Court of Appeal ignoring perjury and defamation is not OK.
The Court Judges need to understand that self litigants are not idiots, can see straight through the interactions in the court room between Lawyers, their former colleagues or industry acquaintances, the blatant use of legalese and their body language.
Judges need to understand that the current culture they are operating in and their attitudes need to change. They have to understand the gravity of their decisions when they operate out of a place of arrogance and obstructing Justice, and what that does to a family who were blindsided and have never recovered, enduring a further 9 years of defamation, humiliation and financial hardship.
The Appeal of Watkins against the ongoing online defamation caused by Highmark Homes and the High Court and Court of appeal’s refusal to read evidence when even Google has higher moral standards is a matter of great public importance. Google Misrepresentation Report. A formal apology to Watkins would not go astray either if they could bother to read this blog and the evidence articles, then muster up a single humble human empathetic bone in their body and recognise what Watkins and her family have had to endure since Highmark Homes ruthlessly and callously ripped their security right out from under them 9 years ago, leaving an immeasurable amount of pain and suffering in their wake.
To cut through all the confusion about how the Court of Appeal allowed a defamatory blog with a fake bio to remain online, read this open letter response to the Court of Appeal Wellington Complaints Manager Maryanne McKennie here:
https://watkinsvshighmarkhomes-nzjustice.blogspot.com/2026/03/open-letter-to-court-of-appeal-nz.html
Comments
Post a Comment