Watkins vs Highmark Homes NZ : What Made Me Spill The Tea

You Can't Have It Both Ways In my previous article's I have brought to the reader's attention that Member Urlich of the ERA stated to Highmark Homes in our hearing in Tauranga "You must improve your practices, you can't have it both ways". Member Urlich of the ERA failed to write her instruction to Highmark in her published decisions so that the High Court would see she was not 100 percent convinced Highmark Homes had acted in good faith. Today I expose the Disputes Tribunal Referee Decision flawed  by contradiction.   That decision is where David Hayes Barrister and vexatious litigants costs award is derived.   Referee Mueller the Disputes Tribunal referee, and the District Court Judge Cameron's Decision to call my employment remuneration agreement of building a spec house through work for profit in lieu of market wages a sham but not to categorize it as derived solely by the employment relationship demonstrates the absurdity of my appeal being rejected...

CLIENT REFERENCE FOR BRUTON KC AND BROOKFIELDS LAWYERS BRUCE COSTAIN - FAMILY TRUST LAW SPECIALISTS As we are thrilled with the service's of these two most ethical and inexpensive legal professionals, it is difficult to put into words how they have assisted our family through a traumatic and difficult separation and matrimonial settlement.  Therefore we have elected to paint a picture instead, after all a picture is worth 1000 words and we know how busy you guys are. As Vanessa states on her website: "A King's Counsel Who Fights By Your Side To get you the best results" We feel it is only fitting that you view first hand what that means and what your family can expect to receive for around $500,000 worth of legal fees if not more  when you pass away: You even get your soiled nappies returned, BUT DO NOT expect to save your land and buildings OR your special sentimental personal effects: And as far as your money and your family name goes, well that's all down the d...

Dear Justice Geoffrey Venning, Britomart Chambers  CIV-2011-404-006060 [2012] NZHC 992 Matrimonial Property Watkins v Watkins, Orix v Watkins Ok Geoffrey, I am done being a smart arse.  I know I will be in a lot of trouble if I have got my ducks out of line won't I.  But please, before you go locking me up in the nut house or applying to the court under the harmful digital communications act to get my blog removed, can you look at this timeline and tell me who you think cheated ?   I am still putting my money on ANZ, Tim and the Steel Merchants with Mike Sullivan D&H as an accomplice, and my sister in law and the lawyers, well that would be for an astute detective to decide wouldn't it. Photo Credit:  Britomart Chambers Geoffrey Venning Mugshot  gjvarb@outlook.com The D on. Geoff Venning The Hon. Geoff Venning – a former High Court Judge – has extensive experience in commercial cases having served over 30 years on the High Court, five of them as ...